It is my fervent
wish that the title of this blog will not ring hollow in a week’s time, in the
way of a book I found a few years ago, written pre-1947, whose title was Must England Lose India? Well, yes, I said at that point, tossing the
book aside without so much as a glance at the pages of erudite argument.
So much for faits accomplis. Yet I feel compelled to admit a very present anxiety
in the pit of my stomach. Standing on
the sidelines in the final run-up to a momentous decision which will be taken
by residents of Scotland next week is a hard thing to do. Quite simply, I don’t want Scotland to
separate from the rest of the United Kingdom.
And here are the reasons.
First, the
things I am not qualified to speak
about. I cannot comment on future revenues
for Scotland and need to leave it to industry spokespeople to elucidate, for
example, to what extent North Sea oil might be dwindling and whether new
discoveries are financially viable. Nor
do I have an economist’s handle on the anomalies inherent in seeking to keep
the pound while severing links with the UK – or the protracted turbulence the
pound may experience in the period immediately following a Yes vote for
independence. But I am disturbed at the
prospect of poor financial health for Scotland as much as I am disturbed by the
tendency for some in the Yes campaign to pass off genuine statements given by (non-political)
experts as ‘scaremongering’ or ‘bullying’.
I’ve watched and
listened to debates with mounting disquiet. I listen to reasons given for independence - amongst
them the need for social justice, and
to act against the bedroom tax, and child poverty. Yet these issues are as live and heated ‘down
here’ to anyone who seeks a just and caring society. I listen to anger expressed over the fact that Westminster has taken the country into unwanted wars – yet recall my own incandescent rage
when the Blair government, with slipshod justification, involved us in Iraq. I hear annoyance about expenses-fiddling by
MPs as though no English, Welsh or Northern Irish person also shares this
opprobrium. I hear voices countering arguments put forward
by pro-unionists with cries that Scottish inventiveness and intelligence will
win out, as though any anxiety we
express over Scotland’s future (and, yes, over our future because the Scottish vote
will affect us all) even takes into question, in the first place, the proven creativity
and ingenuity of Scots. I hear sneers
about the ‘Westminster Elite’ as though ideological distance from the Houses of
Parliament in London is solely the preserve of (northern) geography. In fact, I live just up the same river from the
Houses of Parliament and can leap on a train and be standing in front of them in
less than an hour. But whenever a government
for whom I have not cast my vote takes power, and only spitting distance from
here, I too feel disenfranchised.
I applaud strong
self-governance within a larger framework, and hence am in favour that more
powers are being offered to Scotland in the event of a No vote. Having grown up in the province of Ontario
in Canada in a federalist system - where
provinces are responsible for direct
taxation, natural resources, hospitals, schools, welfare, intra-provincial
transportation and the administration of justice, and where the federal government in Ottawa has
jurisdiction over
international and interprovincial trade, communications and transportation,
banking and currency, foreign affairs, and defence - I
am comfortable with the idea of power devolved away from central
government. I lived just across the Ottawa
River from the province of Quebec whose vibrant character and culture, I would
argue, have always been better protected within Canada with its professed
commitment to biculturalism and bilingualism.
A Quebec flying solo would be not just overshadowed by the remainder of
a still enormous Anglophonic Canada but also by its huge American neighbour to
the south. In the same way, I feel that Scotland is best
served by staying in the union, strengthening its culture, its identity and with
increased powers, but safeguarded from the economic vicissitudes of going it
alone. There are cold winds out there.
My prayer that
Scotland will vote to stay part of the United Kingdom is because I also speak
as a child of Northern Irish parents - with Scottish forebears - and as a
person with a surname (by marriage) that sounds as Welsh as it is possible to
sound who lives in the southeast of England.
I am by no means alone in this country with these kinds of connections. The four corners that they represent are key
to the strengths that currently exist in the UK. We are linked like kin. We have shared history and, I profoundly
hope, a shared future. There is, without
doubt, much to be modified and improved, yet so very much more to be celebrated
in this imperfect but nonetheless joint venture in which we find
ourselves.
Well said Katie. From my position in Jakarta "south of the equator" (not just "south of the border") and 6 hours ahead I listen every morning to the R4 midnight news consisting largely and literally of non-sense on this subject
ReplyDeleteMind you, two of the three most annoying women I have ever met were Scots. Not a good enough reason to get rid of their country though